Thursday, October 6, 2011

What is RCIA? By Mike Murphy


What is RCIA? 
By Mike Murphy
I think identifying the core principle or principles of the RCIA process is key to understanding how the RCIA can be fully integrated into parish life. As I listen to and correspond with other RCIA team members and pastoral leaders, through classes at The Archdiocese, and The Virtual Learning Community for Faith Formation (VLCFF) an adult religious education and faith formation via the internet. I am on my Level II courses in receiving my certificate. I hear a lot of different opinions of what those RCIA core elements are.
Here are some basic RCIA core values that come to mind for me:
1) Provide a safe place for faith sharing. Almost no one speaks in our current RCIA, it was after the Easter vigil that we found out that we had 2 cancer survivors in the class. After 9 months the group members didn’t even know everyone in the groups name. Some people never spoke the whole class. We never got to fully know some of the people, or hear their stories, which is a shame and says little for our faith formation.
2) When I did RCIA my main purpose was to facilitate the formation of disciples of Jesus Christ, not dominate it. People are smarter then most think. They bond, even over the language barrier. I have found it best to perhaps introduce a topic, by reading scripture, watching a segment on DVD, or inviting a topic from the group. Then go around the Circle so as everyone participates, or at the very least checks in. The team members are to encourage sharing provide positive affirmation to the shy ones, and to facilitate or curb some of the group members that just like to go on and on. The group can then freely participate in expressing their thoughts with out the fear of being made fun of or interrupted by an authoritarian “leader” who more often the not, knows very little and just wants to exercise their ego.
3) We are journeying with fellow adults; so adult-learning principles should shape our gatherings. I have found we don’t bring God to the other, but find God in the other.
It’s not just about learning the liturgy it’s about becoming engaged in it! The original meaning that Jesus clearly intended has nothing to do with a particular dogma or doctrine, Catholics, or Protestants. It has even less to do with church membership, its liturgy, rubrics, vestments, candles, or a hierarchy. It has everything to do with “initiation” with the experience of Jesus. Imitating the life of Jesus Christ and sharing God’s kingdom values here on earth. The easiest way to get out of following Christ, is to worship him.

4) I must emphasize the crucial role sponsors play in RCIA. I always thought Brian would be an excellent Sponsor Coordinator. I gave him some books and a DVD on what it means to be a Sponsor, Also a Knights of Columbus Article that was publish I wrote on Sponsorship using the Flannery O’Conner title “The Life you save may be your own” see attachment.  Meet your Catechumen at the entrance to the church. The Catechumen shouldn't have to walk into church alone. If your Catechumen misses Mass, make a follow up call. if you have to miss a Mass, if possible find a substitute to be with your Catechumen.
Show your Catechumen how to bless him or herself with holy water from the font. Introduce your Catechumen to new parishioners each Sunday. Encourage fellowshipping by greeting and handing out hymnals or attending other Church events. It is your job to make him feel part of the community.
Show your Catechumen how to genuflect and bow. For instance, if the tabernacle were in the sanctuary, behind the altar, you would genuflect before entering your pew. If the tabernacle were off to the side or in a separate space, you would bow to the altar before entering your pew. My main point is that personally I felt nervous during Mass. Many of us have not fit in or been involved in a community in a very long time. I was convinced that I didn't belong, that everyone was looking at me and thinking; what is he doing here? Then I started asking myself the same questions.

As a catechist and someone who works in 12 step groups, my biggest dilemma is how to prepare that person, and to somehow bring about a desire for change, open to the Holy Spirit, open to living a life of Sobriety with the aid of God. Believe it or not people fight this “Transformation” I do not know why, Freud called it the “Death Instant”.  You would think that the fact that a person shows up at an RCIA Class or an AA meeting, that alone meant they were ready to change, to become something new. But this is more often then not false. Change is very scary, as Auden wrote:
“We would rather be ruined than changed,
We would rather die in our dread,
Than climb the cross of the moment,
And let our illusions die.”
It has been my experience that as the Alcoholic has to hit bottom, so must the Catechumen… in a sense. For most this means that they must go to the place of their most wounded and injured self; for some with disabilities and mental/physical issues like addiction, depression this can be easy, for others, it is the place where our marriage didn’t work out, the place where we were laughed at in grade school for wearing glasses, where we weren’t the prettiest girl in high school, where we were picked last for a sports team. Perhaps we’re a member of a minority race, or a gender minority. There is always a place where each of us has mourned and felt rejected. And that is the place were we have to start moving forward from. We have to go to that place and weep. We must go to that place where we have felt an outsider, alone; we must go to that place to meet God.
Nowadays, depression affects as much as 25 percent of the population. Although it has always been a human problem, no one really knows why. But what Christians do know is that God is not silent when we suffer. On every page of Scripture, God's depressed children have been able to find hope and a reason to endure. For example, take 2 Corinthians 4:16-18 Nowhere is this principle better seen than in 2 Corinthians 4:16-18. Only when juxtaposed with the endless ages of eternal bliss does suffering in this life become tolerable. There is also another contrast here. In verse 18 Paul juxtaposes “transient” things “that are seen” with “eternal” things “that are unseen.” Especially the connection between verse 18 and verse 16. Our "inner nature" is being renewed as we look or while we look at the unseen, eternal things of the age to come. If you don’t “look” you won’t change! The process of renewal only occurs as the believer looks to things as yet unseen. As we fix the gaze of our hearts on the glorious hope of the age to come, God progressively renews our inner being, despite the decay of our outer frame! Inner renewal does not happen automatically or mechanically. Transformation happens only as or provided that we "look not to the things that are seen, but to the things that are unseen" We come to God with our suffering.
You can start to experience the inward renewal that the apostle Paul experienced when you come to God with your suffering. God seems far away when we suffer. You believe that He exists, but it seems as if He is too busy with everything else, or He just doesn't care. After all, God is powerful enough to end your suffering, but He hasn't. If you start there, you'll reach a dead end pretty quickly. God hasn't promised to explain everything about what He does and what He allows. Instead, He encourages us to start with Jesus. Jesus is God the Son, and He is certainly loved by his heavenly Father. Yet Jesus also went through more suffering than anyone who ever lived!
This to me is the meaning of RCIA, but what I find really happening in RCIA, in fact its goal, is to simply make “nice” people even “Nicer” and I‘m sorry but that is not what Jesus came to earth for, its clear he didn’t come to make nice people feel good about themselves and give us a sense of moral superiority or one-upmanship over others. The word nice does not even appear once in the Bible. What I see happening for the most part is RCIA, in fact it might be said about most of religion, is nothing more then creating a positive self-image and has very little to do with the search for God. I meet with so many people and it seems there has never really been any journeying, any real encounter any real surrender. It’s all simply going through this morality game, thinking that I am going to bend the arm of God to get him to like me, and to give me a positive self-image so I can feel good about myself. The Irony is true religion leads you initially into an encounter with a negative self-image. The self-help author Scot Peck wrote “Most people seem to simply want to feel well of themselves”. Now this is not an awful thing but it is not what Christ calls us to do. Saint Therese of Lisieux (my patron Saint) put it so nicely in her gentle way: "If you are willing to serenely bear the trial of being displeasing to yourself, the you will be for Jesus a pleasant place of shelter."
I believe most RCIA Classes’ will not be teaching the transformative mystery of the cross until we have a model of mystagogy in catechesis that leads people into that true initiation of that painful and terrifying mystery of the cross, and not just some socialization process of how can I feel good belonging to the Parish. (Which is all fine and good, but which is really a 3rd level concern)
Vatican II made it clear that the order of catechumenate would be reintroduced and that the rites of initiation for adults would be revised, interest in the pastoral application of mystagogy was revived. In 1972, when the Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) was established, mystagogy was again given credence in the life of the Church as a Formal step on the path to becoming fully invested in the Catholic life. Since that time some pastoral leaders have paid increasing attention to the ancient notion of mystagogy, attempting to recreate a mystagogical experience much like that of the early centuries of the church. Mystagogy can be seen in the Church back to the time of Christ. In the apostolic era, as the new Church struggled to understand its brand new experience of Christ, early converts could know the initial Christian theology concerning creation, death, resurrection, and eternal life only by participating in the experiences of baptism, Eucharist, and charitable ministry. The Church Fathers did not view mystagogy as simply an initiation to the sacraments but an initiation through the sacraments. The initiation rituals conveyed a reality through which the catechumens would become invested in the life of Christ by experiencing him. Because of this, the Church Fathers insisted that the rituals of initiation be carried out with a great deal of pomp and solemnity and those they incorporate sensual, evocative symbolism capable of reinforcing the mystery of the experience. Modern RCIA leaders have a tendency to interpret the mystagogies of the fourth-century bishops as mere catechetical explanations of the sacraments. (I just finished an awesome book by Cardinal Newman where he defines the sacraments as not only an outward sign of an inner movement of grace, but as also an “instrument of Grace.”) The notion that mystagogical is nothing more than a fifty-day catechesis to aid the converts in their reflection on initiation is an unfortunate and incomplete interpretation; it does not allow mystagogy to flourish throughout the entire period of conversion as the true and proper theology that it is. The brilliance of mystagogy of the early church is that it caused the catechumens to actually participate in the saving activities of Christ through the experiences of baptism, chrism, and Eucharist. For me the real genius of early church Catechesis, and I have discovered much of it through the RCIA library, that I donated to The Blessed Sacrament Library, and witnessed as Lead Catechist under Father Sebastian, is that information was not given to early newcomers, except as it was matched by sacramental experience, in other words real encounters with the holy, and then we will tell you the words. What we have been doing lately is giving catechism answers and words way beyond their level of inner experience of God, which trivializes the entire process. It makes people think they have it when they don’t have it. They’ve taken no journeys with God but they have all the answers. Mystagogy which was the initiation rite into the Cross and Resurrection experience, said that words cannot surpass experience, and that they had to go forward in parallel fashion. The whole reason for dismissals is that the Catechumen could not hear the creed, could not go to communion, until they somehow had experienced communion and experienced what it meant to say, “I believe in one God”. Now the Creed just flows off the tongue effortlessly like they Know what they are talking about, but they do not know what it means! The Jewish people were much smarter when they said; don’t even dare to use the word! Because you don’t even know what you are talking about!

My Last 2 years in RCIA mystagogy was not even taught, I was asked once to correctly pronounce the word for the group and that was it. Instead the class was told that if they did not participate in the 50-day post Confirmation sessions of RCIA, that their Baptism and Confirmation certificates would be withheld. Does anyone realize how childish and counter productive this is? The reason this implemented this was that people stopped coming to RCIA after they were confirmed, what does that tell us? In former RCIA days, the class wept at our last meeting and the Catachuemens of those years still keep in contact and many are parts of various ministries’, we even have reunions and had a party when our RCIA Father visited us from Nepal. As far as anyone holding on to everyone’s confirmation Cert’s, I think they are still holding on to them cause no one cared enough to ask for theirs. My friend just received hers in this month after pestering the RCIA Director for months, only to be dismayed that her “New” Christian name “Veronica” was nowhere to be found on the certificate. You would think that whatever was lacking in the wisdom experience department, would be at least made up for by administrative competency. 

When I was dismissed, which I had to go around myself and ask if I was indeed dismissed (all very Childish) I was told that RCIA rested on knowledge and information, not transformation. Knowledge and information, Isn’t that called Gnosticism? Has anyone ever heard of someone being converted by reading a Papal encyclical, or someone quitting cigarettes’ from simply reading the warning on the side, or getting Sober because a medical journal informed him or her that drinking is not healthy? Or you can go to Jail, or to Hell? No, information and laws doesn’t transform lives! While trying to convey this I was accused of teaching against the Ten Commandments. I was interrupted and my presentation was ended. Had The RCIA director heard me out I was simply stating the Law is not an end unto itself, but an archaic starting point, had Joseph followed the Law he would have had Mary stoned, The Law turned Saint Paul of Tarsus into a mass murder! The Law Killed Christ! Its so sad these people believe if they just follow the law and do good deeds, they can talk God into loving them. Don’t they know that you cannot talk God into loving you, and likewise you cannot talk God into not loving you! They think if they believe this dogma and go to church every Sunday they are in good shape. As Augustine observed, That even the devil believes the laws and dogmas of the Church! It’s not about beliefs; it’s about Faith! There was almost no round-robin faith sharing in RCIA, RCIA let everyone share their experience in a safe environment where they won’t meet with often brash and offhand calloused remarks, also if the leaders tried listening to someone else’s voice besides their own, I believe all evolved will benefit. No one knew my friend was a Cancer survivor, there were 2 others in that class also, we found this out during the last few sessions, such a shame, such opportunities lost!

When we’re meeting with inquirers or catechumens, we try to avoid awkwardness. We don’t want to feel awkward ourselves, and we certainly don’t want the inquirers or catechumens feeling awkward. So we talk. We fill up the silence with chatter.
Sometimes that’s a good thing, especially during inquiry. The new folks usually don’t want to be responsible for the conversation. Often, they have come to listen to you tell them what they are supposed to do. Chatting can help put the inquirers at ease. There comes a moment, however, when we have to stop talking. For many of us, that’s difficult.
I don’t have all the answers, but I have some suggestions. First, we have to be comfortable with silence when we are alone. How much time each day do you spend just being silent? No reading, no television, no Internet, no Facebook. Just you and silence. For me, it’s not much time at all. I suppose I could say my prayer time is silent, but usually I’m reading a psalm or going over the list of people I promised to pray for. I’m lining up my day in my head and asking God to help me with all my tasks and projects. If anyone else were in the room, they might say I was silent. But in my head, there is a lot of noise going on. True silence is difficult. Even so, if we are going to be comfortable with silence with the inquirers and catechumens, we have to practice being silent with ourselves.
The next step is to listen. When I was in college, I learned about “active listening.” Most of us have had at least a little training in active listening. I’m very good at active listening, but in order to know when to stop talking, we have listen to what the other person is saying. If we are listening well, we will hear the needs, wants, and dreams of the person we are listening to. We will also hear a lot of what is not being said. Listening well will help to ask insightful questions that will spur more conversation from your inquirer or catechumen. And once you ask a question, stop talking. This is where I get tripped up a lot. If I ask a question that is anywhere close to a vulnerable spot in the inquirer or catechumen, their response is going to be silence. They don’t yet trust me enough to share their vulnerability. So they have to think about it for a second. They have to decide if they want to answer and then carefully phrase how they are going to answer. All this usually takes about five seconds. But five seconds is often way too long for some to wait. Most tend to jump in and fill the “awkward moment” with a clarification of what I meant or a change of subject. At that point, the other person is off the hook and feels no need to answer. So here’s something to try. Next time you ask a question, wait 10 seconds. Then, after you get comfortable with 10 seconds of silence, bump it up to 20 seconds. I guarantee you that in your next conversation, if you can insert just three meaningful questions, each followed by at least 10-seconds silence, and you will learn way more about your “quiet” inquirer than you ever thought you would.
Another tip that works for me is to talk slower. When I get nervous, I tend to be thinking of the next point I want to make, even as I’m making my first point. To mitigate that, I try to think of my conversation in blocks of threes. For example, suppose you want to tell an inquirer something about your pastor. Think of three qualities of your pastor. Describe the first quality in as much detail as you need to. Then imagine yourself taking a sip of water. Or, actually take a sip of water. Then describe the second quality. Take another sip of water. Finally, describe the third quality. Don’t be surprised if, while you’re sipping, your inquirer begins talking!
My final tip about silence I learned as journalist for film magazines. I would tape record all of my interviews while at the same time taking notes. When the interview was over, I stopped taking notes, but left the tape-recorder running. The most compelling part of the interview often happened after it was “over.” The subject would often relax and say something in a less guarded way because the reporter no longer seemed to be gathering information. You might think that sounds a little duplicitous, but you are not using a tape recorder and you are not looking for a scandalous scoop. You are just using your new skill of not talking to give your inquirers and catechumens a chance to say something meaningful. So, when your session is over, thank the inquirers or catechumens for coming, stand up, gather your things, but keep your mental tape-recorder running. And try not to say too much.
Mother Teresa said, “We need to find God, and he cannot be found in noise and restlessness. God is the friend of silence…. We need silence to be able to touch souls.” Try some of these tips for being silent and see how deeply you will touch souls.
To Be Continued.


Monday, September 14, 2009

Can you Pass The Welsh Rarebit test?



In the 1960's Ken Kesey and his Merry Pranksters passed out fliers at "Happenings" asking: Can you pass the Acid Test? In fact the first electric kool aid acid test was held at the Canoga Park, CA, Unitarian church. The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test: by Tom Wolfe was penned during this period.



Can you Pass The Welsh Rarebit test?

What is Welsh Rarebit you might ask?

Welsh rarebit is a traditional Welsh snack, comparable to toasted cheese.
Traditional rarebit is made by grating cheese, a little milk and butter, adding seasoning (particularly mustard), and spreading the mixture onto hot toast; the whole is then heated briskly from above A modernized representative recipe:

1 oz. butter; 1/4 cup all-purpose flour; 1/2 tsp. dry mustard; room temperature; 1 tsp. Worcestershire sauce; dash of hot-pepper sauce; 3 cups aged Cheddar cheese, shredded.



In a saucepan, melt butter over medium heat; stir in flour & mustard. Slowly stir in the ale and bring to a soft boil; cook, stirring, for 3 minutes, or until thickened and smooth. Stir in Worcestershire and hot-pepper sauces. Gradually add the cheese, stirring briskly until the cheese has melted. Immediately remove saucepan from the heat. (Boiling can cause cheese to curdle). Serve over toasted bread slices.

The Oxford English Dictionary states that it can also be "simply, slices of toasted cheese laid on toast"; though Welsh Rarebit is much, much more!

Welsh Rarebit is a dream-inducing dish sometimes even causing Vivid, lucid nightmares that are famously attributed to overindulgence in Welsh rarebit. This phenomenon was immortalized in Dreams Of A Rarebit Fiend, a series of comic strips written and drawn by Winsor McCay beginning in 1904. McCay began his most Freudian strip. Each strip portrayed a nightmare experienced by a person, a "rarebit fiend" who had made the poor choice of consuming too much rarebit before bedtime. Satiric and sardonic, with Freudian overtones The Dreams strips are not generally meant for children. Rather, they often are surrealistic looks at what could happen if a person gets caught up in a bizarre situation--only to awaken from a nightmare brought on by overindulgence in Dream of a Rarebit Fiend.






There is also a 1906 Edison film based on McCay's comic strip named "Dreams of a Rarebit Fiend" a special effects-filled journey through rarebit-induced nightmares.



This film went on to inspire a Welsh rarebit-fueled nightmare sequence in the Douglas Fairbanks film of 1919 film "When the Clouds Roll By".



There was also an episode of Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. in which the Welsh Rarebit that Gomer consumes causes him to sleepwalk and verbally attack Sergeant Carter, causing uproarious results.





font>
~Monsignor Mike Murphy

The Jesuits and Me!

A very kind note from my favorite priest! See Pics!

Hello Mike
Recently I was home in India to celebrate 25 years of my priestly ordination. 1/4 of those 25 years in spent with you all in Hollywood, a wonderful 1/4 and so I hope you have a piece of this cake and share in my joys.

All my brothers and sisters came and with them, the cousins, nephews and nieces and neighbors that I grew up with we were 250 wonderful people
And we did celebrate!
Thank you for being a part of my life
I cherish it immensely,
e c sebastian SJ (Jesuit) Current assignment, Treasurer of Nepal.






My Backyard!


with my daughter Angelina, who was Baptized alone during our RCIA retreat at Loyola Marymount.



 RCIA PARTY! 2006




Our RCIA class with Cynthia; the anointment of the sick, She beat the Cancer.





God Bless him, he is very missed. But is doing a wonderful job in Katmandu, Nepal. The only Catholic, in a mandatory Hindu country. But sometimes you just have to call in The Jesuits. The Jesuits are a CatholicSaint Ignatius of Loyola, was a knight before becoming a priest. They started the University system, Ignatius of Loyola, They educated the highest courts in Europe, developed the Scientific Method. 16 craters on the moon are named after Jesuits, religious (soldiers of Christ) because the founder, Jesuit priests and brothers are engaged in ministries in 112 nations on six continents.They are best known in the fields of education (schools, colleges, universities, seminaries, theological faculties), intellectualmissionary work and direct evangelization, social justice and human rights activities, interreligious dialogue, and other 'frontier' ministry. research, and cultural pursuits. 

Ignatius was chosen as the first superior-general. He sent his companions as missionaries around Europe to create schools, colleges, and seminaries. It takes 16 years of college to become a Jesuit 8 years of Philosophy and then "after" 8 years of Theology. It was the Jesuits who kicked the renaissance into high gear. First, they founded schools throughout Europe. Jesuit teachers were rigorously trained in both classical studies and theology. For it was them along with the Irish monks who saved all but 2 Greek manuscripts from the dark ages, if not for them all of Greek and roman history, philosophy and art would have been lost so the world. Ignatius and the early Jesuits did recognize, though, that the hierarchical Church was in dire need of reform, and some of their greatest struggles were against corruption, venality, and spiritual lassitude within the Roman Catholic Church.
Ignatius's insistence on an extremely high level of academic preparation for ministry, for instance, was a deliberate response to the relatively poor education of much of the clergy of his time, and the Jesuit vow against "ambitioning prelacies" was a deliberate effort to prevent greed for money or power invading Jesuit circles.
As a result, in spite of their loyalty, Ignatius and his successors often tangled with the pope and the Roman Curia. Over the 450 years since its founding, the Society has both been called the papal "elite troops" and been forced into suppression.
St. Ignatius and the Jesuits who followed him believed that the reform of the Church had to begin with the conversion of an individual's heart. One of the main tools the Jesuits have used to bring about this conversion has been the Ignatian retreat, called the Spiritual Exercises. (From which all 12-step programs owe their steps)
In Bill Wilson's own words:
"Then Father Ed and his Jesuit partners commenced to ask me questions. They wanted to know about the recently published A.A. book and especially about AA's Twelve Steps. My new Jesuit friends pointed to a chart that hung on the wall. They explained that this was a comparison between the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius and the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous, that, in principle, this correspondence was amazingly exact. I believe they also made the somewhat startling statement that spiritual principles set forth in our Twelve Steps appear in the same order that they do in the Ignatius Exercises. There seems no doubt that this singular and exact identification with the Ignatius Exercises has done much to make the close and fruitful relation that we now enjoy with the Catholic Church." (The 'Blue Book', Vol.12, 1960)
By the time of Ignatius' death in 1556, the Jesuits were already operating a network of 74 colleges on three continents. A precursor to liberal education, the Jesuit plan of studies incorporated the Classical teachings of Renaissance humanism into the Scholastic structure of Catholic thought.
In addition to teaching faith, the Ratio StudiorumLatin, Greek, classical literature, poetry, and philosophy as well as non-European languages, sciences and the arts. Furthermore, Jesuit schools encouraged the study of vernacular literature and rhetoric, and thereby became important centers for the training of lawyers and public officials. emphasized the study of
Under the notion that God can be encountered through created things and especially art, they encouraged the use of ceremony and decoration in Catholic ritual and devotion. Perhaps as a result of this appreciation for art, coupled with their spiritual practice of "finding God in all things", many early Jesuits distinguished themselves in the visual and performing arts as well as in music.
The Society today is characterized by its ministries in the fields of missionary work, human rights, social justice and, most notably, higher education. It operates colleges and universities in various countries around the world and is particularly active in the Philippines and India. In the United States alone, it maintains over 50 colleges, universities and high schools. A typical conception of the mission of a Jesuit school will often contain such concepts as proposing Christ as the model of human life, the pursuit of excellence in teaching and learning and life-long spiritual and intellectual growth. In Latin America, Liberal Jesuits have had significant influence in the development of liberation theology, a movement which has been highly controversial.
Under Superior General Pedro Arrupe, social justice and the preferential option for the poor emerged as dominant themes of the work of the Jesuits. On November 16, 1989, six Jesuit priests (Ignacio Ellacuria, Segundo Montes, Ignacio Martin-Baro, Joaquin López y López, Juan Ramon Moreno, and Amado López); their housekeeper, Elba Ramos; and her daughter, Celia Marisela Ramos, were murdered by the Salvadoran military on the campus of the University of Central America in San Salvador, El Salvador, because they had been labeled as subversives by the government. The assassinations galvanized the Society's peace and justice movements, including annual protests at the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security CooperationFort Benning, Georgia, United States, where the assassins were trained under US government sponsorship."


Noam Chomsky wrote in

The Crucifixion of EL SALVADOR:

In February 1980, the Archbishop of EI Salvador, Oscar Romero, sent a letter to President Carter in which he begged him not to send military aid to the junta that ran the country. He said such aid would be used to "sharpen injustice and repression against the people's organizations" which were struggling "for respect for their most basic human rights" (hardly news to Washington, needless to say).

A few weeks later, Archbishop Romero was assassinated while saying a mass. The neo-Nazi
Roberto d'Aubuisson is generally assumed to be responsible for this assassination (among countless other atrocities). D'Aubuisson was "leader for-life" of the ARENA party, which now governs El Salvador; members of the party, like current Salvadoran president Alfredo Cristiani, had to take a blood oath of loyalty to him.

Thousands of peasants and urban poor took part in a commemorative mass a decade later, along with many foreign bishops, but the US was notable by its absence. The Salvadoran Church formally proposed Romero for sainthood.

All of this passed with scarcely a mention in the country that funded and trained Romero's assassins. The New York Times, the "newspaper of record," published no editorial on the assassination when it occurred or in the years that followed, and no editorial or news report on the commemoration.

On March 7, 1980, two weeks before the assassination, a state of siege had been instituted in El Salvador, and the war against the population began in force (with continued US support and involvement). The first major attack was a big massacre at the Rio Sumpul, a coordinated military operation of the Honduran and Salvadoran armies in which at least 600 people were butchered. Infants were cut to pieces with machetes, and women were tortured and drowned. Pieces of bodies were found in the river for days afterwards. There were church observers, so the information came out immediately, but the mainstream US media didn't think it was worth reporting.

Peasants were the main victims of this war, along with labor organizers, students, priests or anyone suspected of working for the interests of the people. In Carter's last year, 1980, the death toll reached about 10,000, rising to about 13,000 for 1981 as the Reaganites took command.

In October 1980, the new archbishop condemned the "war of extermination and genocide against a defenseless civilian population" waged by the security forces. Two months later they were hailed for their "valiant service alongside the people against subversion" by the favorite US "moderate," Jose Napoleon Duarte, as he was appointed civilian president of the junta.

The role of the "moderate" Duarte was to provide a fig leaf for the military rulers and ensure them a continuing flow of US funding after the armed forces had raped and murdered four churchwomen from the US. That had aroused some protest here; slaughtering Salvadorans is one thing, but raping and killing American nuns is a definite PR mistake. The media evaded and downplayed the story, following the lead of the Carter Administration and its investigative commission.

The incoming Reaganites went much further, seeking to justify the atrocity, notably Secretary of State Alexander Haig and UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick. But it was still deemed worthwhile to have a show trial a few years later, while exculpating the murderous junta-and, of course, the paymaster.

The independent newspapers in El Salvador, which might have reported these atrocities, had
been destroyed. Although they were mainstream and pro-business, they were still too undisciplined for the military's taste. The problem was taken care of in 1980-81, when the editor of one was murdered by the security forces; the other fled into exile. As usual, these events were considered too insignificant to merit more than a few words in US newspapers.

In November 1989, six Jesuit priests, their cook and her daughter, were murdered by the army. That same week, at least 28 other Salvadoran civilians were murdered, including the head of a major union, the leader of the organization of university women, nine members of an Indian farming cooperative and ten university students.

The news wires carried a story by AP correspondent Douglas Grant Mine, reporting how soldiers had entered a working-class neighborhood in the capital city of San Salvador, captured six men, added a 14-year-old boy for good measure, then lined them all up against a wall and shot them. They "were not priests or human rights campaigners," Mine wrote, "so their deaths have gone largely unnoticed"-as did his story.

The Jesuits were murdered by the Atlacatl Battalion, an elite unit created, trained and equipped by the United States. It was formed in March 1981, when fifteen specialists in counterinsurgency were sent to El Salvador from the US Army School of Special Forces. From the start, the Battalion was engaged in mass murder. A US trainer described its soldiers as "particularly ferocious....We've always had a hard time getting them to take prisoners instead of ears."


Ignatian spirituality

Like all Catholic spirituality, the spirituality practiced by the Jesuits, called Ignatian spirituality, is based on the Catholic faith and the gospels. Aside from the "Constitutions," "The Letters," and "Autobiography," Ignatian spirituality draws most specially from St. Ignatius' "Spiritual Exercises," whose purpose is "to conquer oneself and to regulate one's life in such a way that no decision is made under the influence of any inordinate attachment." In other words, the Exercises are intended, in Ignatius' view, to give the exercitant (the person undertaking them) a greater degree of freedom from his or her own likes, dislikes, comforts, wants, needs, drives, appetites and passions that they may choose based solely on what they discern God's will is for them.
In the words of Kolvenbach, the Exercises try to "unite two apparently incompatible realities: exercises and spiritual." It invites to "unlimited generosity" in contemplating God, yet going down to the level of many details.
Ignatian spirituality (see any connection to the 12 steps?)
Ignatian spirituality can be described as an active attentiveness to God joined with a prompt responsiveness to God, who is ever active in people's lives. Though it includes many forms of prayer, discernment, and apostolic service, it is the interior dispositions of attentiveness and responsiveness that are ultimately crucial. The result is that Ignatian spirituality has a remarkable 'nowness,' or Zen, both in its attentiveness to God and in its desire to respond to what God is asking of the person now.
The Ignatian ideal has the following characteristics:

Self-awareness

Ignatius recommends the twice daily examen. This is a guided method of prayerfully reviewing the events of a day to awaken an inner sensitivity to one's own actions, desires, and spiritual state through each moment reviewed. The goals are to see where God is challenging the person to change and growth, where God is calling the person to deeper reflection (this is particularly apt when discerning whether one has a jesuit vocation in life), and where sinful or imperfect attitudes or blind spots are. The general examen, often at the end of the day, is, as the name implies, a general review. The particular examen, often in the middle of the day, focuses on a particular fault identified by the person to be worked on over some days or weeks.

Spiritual direction (sponsorship?)

Meditation and contemplation, and for instance the aforementioned examen, are best guided, Ignatius says, by an experienced person. Jesuits, and those following Ignatian spirituality, meet with their spiritual director (traditionally a priest, though in recent years many laypersons have undertaken this role) on a regular basis (weekly or monthly) to discuss the fruits of their prayer life and be offered guidance. Ignatius sees the director as someone who can rein in impulsiveness or excesses, goad the complacent, and keep people honest with themselves. If the director is a priest, spiritual direction may or may not be connected with the Sacrament of Penance. Ignatius counseled frequent use of sacrament and while some directors see them as integrally linked, others hold them to be Effective love

The founder of the Society of Jesus put effective love (love shown in deeds) above affective love (love based on nice feelings). He usually ended his most important letters with "I implore God to grant us all the grace to know His holy will and to accomplish it perfectly." True and perfect love demands sacrifice, the abandonment of tastes and personal preferences, and the perfect renunciation of self. This can be taken together with the prayer for generosity, which asks for teaching to be generous, to serve God as God deserves without counting any cost or seeking any reward except knowing that one is doing God's will.

Detachment

Where Francis of Assisi's concept of poverty emphasized the spiritual benefits of simplicity and dependency, Ignatius emphasized detachment, or "indifference." For Ignatius, whether one was rich or poor, healthy or sick, in an assignment one enjoyed or one didn't, was comfortable in a culture or not, etc., should be a matter of spiritual indifference—a modern phrasing might put it as serene acceptance. Hence, a Jesuit (or one following Ignatian spirituality), placed in a comfortable, wealthy neighborhood should continue to live the Gospel life without anxiety or possessiveness, and if plucked instantly from that situation to be placed in a poor area and subjected to hardships should simply cheerfully accept that as well, without a sense of loss or being deprived.

Prayers, efforts at self-conquest, and reflection

Ignatius's little book, the Spiritual Exercises is a fruit of months of prayer, and it is through prayer that one gets to understand Ignatian Spirituality. Jesuits stress the need to take time to reflect and to pray because prayer is at the foundation of Jesus's life. Prayer, in Ignatian spirituality, does not dispense from "helping oneself," a phrase frequently used by Ignatius.
Upon his recovery from battle wounds, St. Ignatius of Loyola hung his military accoutrements before the image of the Virgin of Montserrat. Then he led a period of asceticism to found the Society of Jesus.

Finding God in All Things

The vision that Ignatius places at the beginning of the Exercises keeps sight of both the Creator and the creature, the One and the other swept along in the same movement of love. In it, God offers himself to humankind in an absolute way through the Son, and humankind responds in an absolute way by a total self-donation. There is no longer sacred or profane, natural or supernatural, mortification or prayer - because it is one and the same Spirit who brings it about that the Christian will "love God in all things - and all things in God." Hence, Jesuits have always been active in the graphic and dramatic arts, literature and the sciences.

Examen of Consciousness

The Examen of Consciousness is a simple prayer directed toward developing a spiritual sensitivity to the special ways God approaches, invites, and calls. Ignatius recommends that the examen be done at least twice, and suggests five points of prayer:
  • Recalling that one is in the holy presence of God
  • Thanking God for all the blessings one has received
  • Examining how one has lived his day
  • Asking God for forgiveness
  • Resolution and offering a prayer of hopeful recommitment
It is important, however, that the person feels free to structure the Examen in a way that is most helpful to him. There is no right way to do it; nor is there a need to go through all of the five points each time. A person might, for instance, find himself spending the entire time on only one or two points. The basic rule is: Go wherever God draws you. And this touches upon an important point: the Examen of Consciousness is primarily a time of prayer; it is a "being with God." It focuses on one's consciousness of God, not necessarily one's conscience regarding sins and mistakes.

Discernment

Discernment is rooted in the understanding that God is ever at work in one's life, "inviting, directing, guiding and drawing" one "into the fullness of life." Its central action is reflection on the ordinary events of one's life. It presupposes an ability to reflect on the ordinary events of one's life, a habit of personal prayer, self-knowledge, knowledge of one's deepest desires and openness to God's direction and guidance. Discernment is a prayerful 'pondering' or 'mulling over' the choices a person wishes to consider. In his discernment, the person's focus should be on a quiet attentiveness to God and sensing rather than thinking. His goal is to understand the choices in his heart: to see them, as it were, as God might see them. In one sense, there is no limit to how long he might wish to continue in this. Discernment is a repetitive process, yet as the person continues, some choices should of their own accord fall by the wayside while others should gain clarity and focus. It is a process that should move inexorably toward a decision.

Service and humility

Ignatius emphasized the active expression of God's love in life and the need to be self-forgetful in humility. Part of Jesuit formation is the undertaking of service specifically to the poor and sick in the most humble ways: Ignatius wanted Jesuits in training to serve part of their time as novices and in tertianship (see Formation below) as the equivalent of orderlies in hospitals, for instance, emptying bed pans and washing patients, to learn humility and loving service. Jesuit educational institutions often adopt mottoes and mission statements that include the idea of making students "men for others," and the like. Jesuit missions have generally included medical clinics, schools and agricultural development projects as ways to serve the poor or needy while preaching the Gospel.
One of the happiest days of my life, becoming a Lay Jesuit, Becoming head Catechist and facilitator to Adults converting to the faith. Under Father Sebastian!